Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
language:impl [2021/11/21 12:40]
rajit [The ptype]
language:impl [2023/04/09 18:06] (current)
rajit [Overrides]
Line 59: Line 59:
 port list. As an illustration, consider: port list. As an illustration, consider:
  
-<code>+<code act>
 defproc type1 (bool a, b) { ... } defproc type1 (bool a, b) { ... }
 defproc type2 <: type1 (bool c) { ... } defproc type2 <: type1 (bool c) { ... }
Line 72: Line 72:
 the port list example above. the port list example above.
  
-<code>+<code act>
 template<pint N> template<pint N>
 defproc type1 (bool a, b) { ... } defproc type1 (bool a, b) { ... }
Line 82: Line 82:
 However, we can also define ''type2'' in the following manner: However, we can also define ''type2'' in the following manner:
  
-<code>+<code act>
 template<pint N> template<pint N>
 defproc type1 (bool a, b) { ... } defproc type1 (bool a, b) { ... }
Line 103: Line 103:
 as follows: as follows:
  
-<code>+<code act>
 type2<5> x; type2<5> x;
 // x.N, x.M are both accessible! // x.N, x.M are both accessible!
Line 113: Line 113:
 the instance the instance
  
-<code>+<code act>
 type2<5,7> x; type2<5,7> x;
 // x.M=5, x.N=7 // x.M=5, x.N=7
 </code> </code>
  
-would set ''N'' (the new template parameter) to ''5'', and +would set ''M'' (the new template parameter) to ''5'', and 
-''M'' (the parent, still definable parameter) to ''7''. Finally,+''N'' (the parent, still definable parameter) to ''7''. Finally,
 the following would be an error: the following would be an error:
  
-<code>+<code act>
 template<pint N> defproc type1 (bool a, b) { ... } template<pint N> defproc type1 (bool a, b) { ... }
 template<pint N> defproc type2 <: type1 (bool c) { ... } template<pint N> defproc type2 <: type1 (bool c) { ... }
 +</code>
 +<code>
 -[ERROR]-> Duplicate meta-parameter name in port list: `N' -[ERROR]-> Duplicate meta-parameter name in port list: `N'
            Conflict occurs due to parent type: type1            Conflict occurs due to parent type: type1
Line 134: Line 136:
 consider the following example:  consider the following example: 
  
-<code>+<code act>
 defproc buffer (e1of2? l, e1of2! r) defproc buffer (e1of2? l, e1of2! r)
 { {
Line 149: Line 151:
 define a specific implementation as follows: define a specific implementation as follows:
  
-<code>+<code act>
 defproc wchb <: buffer () defproc wchb <: buffer ()
 { {
Line 167: Line 169:
 specification for a buffer at the CHP level of abstraction would be: specification for a buffer at the CHP level of abstraction would be:
  
-<code>+<code act>
 defproc buffer (chan?(bool) l, chan!(bool) r) defproc buffer (chan?(bool) l, chan!(bool) r)
 { {
Line 191: Line 193:
 implementation of the original. The syntax for this is shown below: implementation of the original. The syntax for this is shown below:
  
-<code>+<code act>
 defproc wchb <: buffer() defproc wchb <: buffer()
 +{ e1of2 l, r; } // override block +{ e1of2 l, r; } // override block
Line 210: Line 212:
 only syntax permited is of the form within an override block is only syntax permited is of the form within an override block is
  
-<code>+<code act>
 +{ +{
     type list-of-ids;     type list-of-ids;
Line 243: Line 245:
 representation of the Boolean variable. representation of the Boolean variable.
  
 +=== Overriding conditional instances and templated types ===
  
 +An instance created in a type definition may be created only under certain circumstances. 
 +This can occur in templated types, where template parameters can affect the instances within the type.
 +The override block has the simple syntax shown above. However, to account for conditional instances,
 +the override block directives implicitly check if the instance exists before applying the override. (Note that
 +ACT does not permit different types for the same instance name under different conditions.)
  
 +When a type is being overridden by another, the new implementation may have additional template parameters.
 +The override syntax above requires the complete list of template parameters to be specified. Instead, we also
 +provide a single extension override syntax
  
- +<code act> 
- ++{ 
 +    type<param1,param2,...,paramN>+ id;   // single ID only 
 +    ... 
 + } 
 +</code> 
 +The ''+'' indicates that these are //extra// template parameter(s) that should be added to the existing ones that have already been specified for the instance ''id'' in the original type definition.